tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35868118.post926161194610475866..comments2023-06-05T03:35:52.370-05:00Comments on Geek Thoughts: Injured PenaltyAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15054839933454487209noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35868118.post-35238642758414971172007-09-25T14:30:00.000-05:002007-09-25T14:30:00.000-05:00they changed some rules this year that are working...they changed some rules this year that are working towards the no obstruction/interference. I think I might blog on this tonight.<BR/><BR/>The interference rule has been altered to allow for a major penalty and a game misconduct when an injury results.<BR/><BR/>source:<BR/>http://tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=219101&hubname=nhljchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16896154305020403499noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35868118.post-11889831205651865902007-09-17T14:15:00.000-05:002007-09-17T14:15:00.000-05:00"draw blood" is referring to a high stick. This m..."draw blood" is referring to a high stick. This mind of thinking does not apply for other penalties. Would have had to takend Cheechoo's knee off in the play offs for that knee on knee to be a "major". You are getting penalties mixed up. <BR/><BR/>I dont know the exact ruling on this. I would think it would be an injury if the player had to leave the ice or had to be helped off. I dont recall (and my memory is going) there being a "major" for interference. That rule on its own is a very gray area.jchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16896154305020403499noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35868118.post-32950284816467786672007-09-17T13:07:00.000-05:002007-09-17T13:07:00.000-05:00Oh man... don’t get me started... I’ve ranted on t...Oh man... don’t get me started... I’ve ranted on this issue a few times... it’s complete crap. The action should be the penalty, not if there is an injury...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com